What I Wish I Had Known about Student Motivation

“You’re a smart kid; I just wish you’d apply yourself in my class.”

 

Most teachers have uttered a similar phrase. I know I did. I remember one student particularly well; we’ll call him Jerry. His quick answers and witty insights—when he paid attention—told me he was smart enough to be doing better than he was.

 

My pep talks with Jerry never did much good, though. Sometimes, the more I goaded, the less he tried, which frustrated my ambitions of channeling Robin Williams’ character in Dead Poet’s Society, inspiring students to hang on every word of Nathaniel Hawthorne or Emily Dickinson. It felt like even if I stood on my desk dramatically reciting “O Captain! My Captain!” Jerry’s response would’ve been the same: meh.


Sending students the wrong message

Years later, while digging into research on student motivation, I realized what I had gotten wrong. Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck has shown that telling students they are smart actually lowers their motivation and achievement. In an experiment, Dweck and her colleagues treated two groups of students quite differently. They consistently praised one group for its ability, saying things like, “Wow. You got eight right; you must be really smart.” They praised the second group for effort: “Wow. You got eight right; you must have worked really hard.”

 

The students hearing continual praise for their ability developed a “fixed-mindset” and came to believe that achievement or “smarts” was innate, not developed through effort. Consequently, they began to avoid challenging tasks, fearing that if they tried and failed, they no longer would appear smart. On the other hand, 90 percent of the students hearing praise for their effort took on more challenging tasks and found they actually enjoyed the work.

 

My first mistake, then, was telling Jerry he was smart.

 

My second was trying to guilt trip him. I played on the fact that Jerry seemed to like me, saying, “Come on, you really should read The Scarlet Letter. Do it for me.”

 

The right kind of teacher talk

 

Edward Deci, who spent his career researching intrinsic motivation, found that motivation stems from two deep psychological needs: competence and self-determination. We enjoy challenging activities if we choose them. Even positive feedback from teachers can undermine motivation if it comes across as coercing students (“You should keep up the good work.”). What’s more effective is providing feedback on how students measure up to a defined standard.

 

What I realized, too late, was that teacher talk is incredibly important. When teachers aren’t thoughtful about what they say in classrooms or write on papers, they can chip away at students’ intrinsic motivation to learn.

 

Here are a couple of examples I’ve drawn from research showing “should” and “should nots” when it comes to teacher talk.

 

  • Say this (growth mindset) . . . "Your practice is really paying off. You're getting your math facts down."
  • Not this (fixed mindset) . . . "Wow, that was quick! You blazed right through those problems! You’re a math whiz."
  • Say this (growth mindset) . . . "You seem frustrated and tired right now. That means your brain is working hard. We’ll keep at it, and I know you’re going to get it."
  • Not this (fixed mindset) . . . "Not everyone is a natural at this. Let’s do a few more problems and then move on to something you’re better at."


If I could do it over again with the benefit of hindsight, I’d tell Jerry something like this: “You’ve got a lot of potential. Right now, it’s going to waste. I’d like to help you unleash it, but that’s up to you.”

 

What kind of teacher talk did you hear when you were a student?

Read about Carol Dweck’s book, Mindset.

Learn more about Edward Deci and self-determination theory.

 

Join my upcoming session at the ASCD annual conference, "Bored to Death: What We Know (and Ignore) about Student Motivation. Sunday, March 25, 3:00-4:30 pm room 111, Pennsylvania Convention Center, First Level.

 

Bryan Goodwin is the author Simply Better: Doing What Matters Most to Change the Odds for Student Success.  

Comments




  • Patrick - A great story about your school experience. With high test scores but little motivation, I'm wondering if you were then labeled an underachiever, or perhaps called a slacker or just plain lazy. I've working with a lot of grade school students who were motivated to learn more in school if the topic was of interest to them. Sometimes, I had a hard time pulling kids away from focusing only on one topic. It was sometimes a tough call to tell them there is more to life than only getting into in-depth study of airplanes.
    Richard_Lange, 1 year ago | Flag
  • Good point, Andy. In the interest of space, I omitted relatedness (i.e., emotional security or feeling cared for supports motivation) partly because Deci and Ryan downplay it as well, stating that it plays a lesser or more "distal role" in intrinsic motivation than autonomy and competence. That said, there's some good evidence (see for example Jeffrey Cornelius-White's 2007 meta-analysis) that teacher-student relationships characterized by empathy and warmth are positively correlated with higher levels of student achievement. That seems to confirm the old adage that people (and students) may not care how much you know, until they know how much you care.
    Bryan_Goodwin, 1 year ago | Flag
  • Good point, Andy. In the interest of space, I omitted relatedness (i.e., emotional security or feeling cared for supports motivation) partly because Deci and Ryan downplay it as well, stating that it plays a lesser or more "distal role" in intrinsic motivation than autonomy and competence. That said, there's some good evidence (see for example Jeffrey Cornelius-White's 2007 meta-analysis) that teacher-student relationships characterized by empathy and warmth are positively correlated with higher levels of student achievement. That seems to confirm the old adage that people (and student) often don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care.
    Bryan_Goodwin, 1 year ago | Flag
  • Actually three innate needs from Deci & Ryan's work: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

    Andy_Saltarelli, 1 year ago | Flag
  • These are nice summaries. Thanks for sharing, Doug.
    Bryan_Goodwin, 1 year ago | Flag

Inappropriate Flag

Flagging notifies the ASCD EDge webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!

If you believe this content violates the Terms of Service, please write a short description why. Thank you.

Inappropriate Comment Flag

Flagging notifies the ASCD EDge webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!

Email Friends

Your First Name (optional)

Email Addresses (comma separated)

Import friends

Message to Friends (optional)

Are you human?

Or, you can forward this blog with your own email application.

Terms of Service